Changes in the Sun’s Surface to Bring Next Climate Change

I can see the headlines now. We must, at all costs, get wind farms up and running ASP. Only the wind farms can save us from global cooling. The govt has decided to put heating coils on the massive wind turbine blades to help warm the earth and save us from impending DOOM. No need to read fiction, just listen to the media.

Changes in the Sun’s Surface to Bring Next Climate Change
January 2, 2008
Today, the Space and Science Research Center, (SSRC) in Orlando, Florida announces that it has confirmed the recent web announcement of NASA solar physicists that there are substantial changes occurring in the sun’s surface. The SSRC has further researched these changes and has concluded they will bring about the next climate change to one of a long lasting cold era.
Today, Director of the SSRC, John Casey has reaffirmed earlier research he led that independently discovered the sun’s changes are the result of a family of cycles that bring about climate shifts from cold climate to warm and back again.
“We today confirm the recent announcement by NASA that there are historic and important changes taking place on the sun’s surface. This will have only one outcome – a new climate change is coming that will bring an extended period of deep cold to the planet. This is not however a unique event for the planet although it is critically important news to this and the next generations. It is but the normal sequence of alternating climate changes that has been going on for thousands of years. Further according to our research, this series of solar cycles are so predictable that they can be used to roughly forecast the next series of climate changes many decades in advance. I have verified the accuracy of these cycles’ behavior over the last 1,100 years relative to temperatures on Earth, to well over 90%.”
As to what these changes are Casey says, “The sun’s surface flows have slowed dramatically as NASA has indicated. This process of surface movement, what NASA calls the “conveyor belt” essentially sweeps up old sunspots and deposits new ones. NASA’s studies have found that when the surface movement slows down, sunspot counts drop significantly. All records of sunspot counts and other proxies of solar activity going back 6,000 years clearly validates our own findings that when we have sunspot counts lower then 50 it means only one thing – an intense cold climate, globally. NASA says the solar cycle 25, the one after the next that starts this spring will be at 50 or lower. The general opinion of the SSRC scientists is that it could begin even sooner within 3 years with the next solar cycle 24. What we are saying today is that my own research and that of the other scientists at the SSRC verifies that NASA is right about one thing – a solar cycle of 50 or lower is headed our way. With this next solar minimum predicted by NASA, what I call a “solar hibernation,” Full report here:

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “Changes in the Sun’s Surface to Bring Next Climate Change”

  1. essexcountywind Says:

    If this whole mass hysteria wasn’t so insane, it would almost be funny. Yes, we should install heaters on the turbine blades or maybe giant touques for each blade. I better get knitting.

  2. 654321a Says:

    The new world order have been fooling us for years.This news will never make it out to the mainstream.Carbon trading credits is what corporations want and that is what Gore calls cap and trade in his fictional documentry

  3. A.C. McCloud Says:

    Be careful with this outfit..

    This Casey guy has very little pedigree.

  4. black Sheep Says:

    The Sun may be a factor in the long, moderate, natural temperature cycles the earth has experienced in the past?

    Confirms what I just read on

    I’m not a scientist and found the discussion rather in depth. The evidence put forward by those who challenge the IPCC report leads this reader to conclude that the reports by the IPCC do not reflect up-to-date science.

    -ocean temperatures are not warming but dropping
    -the troposphere is not warming per climate model predictions
    -climate model precipitation predictions are off
    -Arctic temperatures are similar to pre-1940
    -Recent “unprecedented” arctic ice melt is attributed to wind patterns/ocean circulation
    -Greenland is mimicking the 1930’s
    -IPCC climate models were never not validated
    -the IPCC ignored contradictory scientific findings

    Why did the IPCC ignore the input of hundreds of dissenting scientists?

    Why are governments proposing to spend hundreds of billions on man-made-carbon emissions when a child dies from a famine related illness every 5 seconds?

    Just another excuse for a tax grab and jobs for UN bureaucrats, scientists in the GHG stable and carbon traders?

    Here’s the confessions of a scientist who worked for the Australian government on carbon bean counting…..”I Was On the Global Warming Gravy Train”

    Three Stages of Knowledge and the IPCC
    Our scientific understanding of global warming has gone through three stages:

    1985–2003 Old ice core data led us to strongly suspect that CO2 causes global warming.

    2003–2007 New ice core data eliminated previous reason for suspecting CO2. No evidence to suspect or exonerate CO2.

    From Aug 2007 Know for sure that greenhouse is not causing global warming. CO2 no longer a suspect.

    The IPCC 2007 report (the latest and greatest from the IPCC) is based on all scientific literature up to mid 2006. The Bali Conference is the bureaucratic response to that report. Too bad that the data has changed since then!

    Children are being traumatized by this cataclysmic end of the world propaganda coming from the likes of Al Gore. Do your kids a favour. When you tuck them into bed tonight, tell them scientists are still trying to understand what is happening but the planet is a miracle in itself and won’t be undergoing these cataclysmic events like some people are saying.

    Sorry Al Gore. The science is not settled? You insult the profession.

    And PM Harper. Why are you basing your government policy on science that contradicts what is being observed??

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: