How NOT to Have Electricity

by Alan Caruba

Every week there’s some new proposal to cover the nation with wind farms and solar panels.

Electricity is so commonplace that no one gives any thought to not having access to it. Few give any consideration to how it is generated, but we are now being inundated with the most virulent nonsense about how wind or solar power is “clean” and practically “free.” Every week there’s some new proposal to cover the nation with wind farms and solar panels.

The problem for everyone who wants to get rich with these energy sources or those who think they are the answer to our energy needs is that neither wind, nor solar can ever power anything more than relatively small projects like a farm or a local stadium. A nation of more than three hundred million people, however, needs a lot of generation capacity.

All the razzle-dazzle of television advertising and public relations propaganda cannot justify the building of massive wind or solar farms. They are simply inadequate to the production of the electricity the nation requires now and in the future. The weird thing about T. Boone Pickens’ pitch is that he talks about oil dependency to justify wind power, but vehicles are not powered by wind. Nor are they likely to be powered by liquified natural gas as Pickens suggests.

By contrast, the July edition of Energy Tribune devoted some of its pages to the comeback of nuclear power in America. What jumped out at me was co-editor Robert Bryce’s citation of the fact that, “The U.S. government has spent some $7 billion building a repository for nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain in Nevada” and that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has declared that it “is never going to open” and is “not the answer to nuclear waste storage.”

Senator Reid recently said that, “Coal is making us sick. Oil is making us sick,” and then went on to blather insanely about global warming.

According to Bryce, “On June 3, the Department of Energy submitted an 8,600-page application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission seeking approval of the Yucca Mountain site for waste storage. Just one day later, Nevada urged the agency to reject the application.” This is a glaring example of how to make sure America lacks the electrical energy it needs.

Throughout the debate over energy use, the Big Lie has been that industrial and other activities generate carbon dioxide emissions that, in turn, are causing global warming. Ergo, we have to radically alter every aspect of modern life to avoid the Earth’s destruction.

The problem with that is a decade-old cooling period that the Earth entered in 1998 and which is getting colder, not warmer. The other problem is the fact that the Earth has passed through periods in which the levels of CO2 in our atmosphere were much higher than they are today.

Since it is getting colder, we are going to need more electricity and other sources of energy to keep us warm in our homes, offices, schools, et cetera. We are going to have to burn coal, currently the major source of power, to generate electricity as well as the cheapest and most abundant. We will continue to use natural gas as well. All the hydroelectric sources have been identified and are in use at present.

That leaves nuclear. An Energy Tribune article by William E. Burchill serves up lots of information about the nuclear production of electrical energy. Worldwide, 441 nuclear reactors are providing electricity to one billion people. Presently nuclear power provides twenty percent of America’s electricity needs, thanks to the 104 nuclear plants operating in the U.S.

Here’s something to keep in mind. “No U.S. plant worker or member of the public has ever been injured or killed by an accident caused by nuclear power.” Moreover, amidst the frenzy over CO2, nuclear is “an emissions-free source of electricity.”

Continue reading article


3 Responses to “How NOT to Have Electricity”

  1. GuyInCT Says:

    I agree that the wind farms are becoming a blight on the landscape. But in a way you can’t help but laugh at the exquisite irony of it all. The Enviromaniacs, by stubbornly – almost psychotically – opposing nuclear power for the last few decades are now waking up to the realization of what they have wrought: windfarms sprouting up on the untamed vistas, farms and small towns across the country.

  2. essexcountywind Says:

    Ironic Insanity indeed.

    The worl wide bat population is going to be severely damaged by the proliferation of wind turbines. Do these “environmentalists” know nothing of eco-systems?

    Latest study on the world’s experts on bats:

    Based on estimates of installed capacity and the limitations and assumptions with respect to fatality rates, projected annual fatalities of bats in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands in the eastern United States could range from 33,017 to 61,935 (2,158-MW installed capacity) or from 58,997 to 110,667 (3,856-MW installed capacity) bats per year by 2020 in just this one region (National Research Council 2007). These projections, although hypothetical, should be of particular concern for species of migratory tree bats that experience the highest fatalities at wind energy facilities in North America.

  3. Recent Links Tagged With "destruction" - JabberTags Says:

    […] by shaghaghi on Sat 06-12-2008 Creative destruction Saved by tomasmalmsten on Tue 02-12-2008 How NOT to Have Electricity Saved by owensad on Sat 22-11-2008 Oh FFS Saved by BillyG on Tue 18-11-2008 Leaving Fear […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: